Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Devil’s Advocate’

Reluctant admission of guilt is not ‘Redemption’

Reluctant admission of guilt is not ‘Redemption’

Suppose one commits a crime. Before He/She commits he/she is warned. Nevertheless He/She goes ahead and commits that crime he/she is warned against. He/She is caught and brought before the Court. Court finds Him/Her guilty of committing the Crime despite warning. Court sentences Him/Her to Jail. He/She has no other choice but to accept the Guilt. Or do they?

Will it be His/Her Redemption?  Sure I am that your answer would be capital NO.

But then if you are ‘Chamcha In Chief of CON party and work in a CON party Rag Called ‘The Hindustan Times’ then you suspend all logic and try give it a spin and try prove that He/She is statesman/woman since accepts guilt.

What I am talking about is this article Written by Chamcha In Chief’ Pankaj Vohra of HT in today’s paper. Come lets us see what he has to offer. My comments in Communal Saffron Color :)

PM redeems his image.

Pankaj Vohra, Political Editor HT.

By accepting responsibility for the decision to appoint PJ Thomas as the Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC) following the apex court’s ruling that the  appointment was illegal, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has exhibited statesmanship of the highest order. In doing so, he has sent out a strong signal that if a mistake is made, it is best to admit it rather than hide behind bureaucratic notings. The PM has finally shown that the buck stops with him and that he, like any other citizen, had no hesitation in accepting the verdict of the highest court.

(Reading above gives you an impression that MMS has done Supreme Court and Indians a great favor by accepting the Supreme Court Verdict as if he had a Choice of not accepting it! As for STATESMANSHIP! WTF! Is he not duty bound to accept/respect Apex Court Order? As for hiding behind he would have surely done that, if he had even a smallest of excuse. We all know him quite well by now. Huh!)

Equally commendable is the immediate response from the leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Sushma Swaraj, the shadow prime minister, that the matter should be closed and one must move on. Swaraj was also on the panel to appoint Thomas though she disagreed with both the prime minister and the home minister on the choice of the nominee. Her counterpart in the Rajya Sabha, Arun Jaitley, though wants some clarifications on the issue. Given the prime minister’s candid admission, the matter could blow over in Parliament.

(That was stupid of Sushama saying pre maturely. She should have waited for MMS to speak in Lok Sabha first. Majority view is reflected by Arun Jaitley)

However, the appointment has several lessons for the ruling party. In future, there should be proper scrutiny of every person nominated for a sensitive position, particularly the offices that directly deal with corruption. Singh’s admission of his mistake and his subsequent comment that the appointment was not a result of coalition compulsions indicate that Thomas was shortlisted by elements within his own party.

(Quite interestingly today’s HT carries this article by Ashok Malik titled ‘A Curious Choice’ Must Read :) )

Singh, who was in the eye of a storm after expressing helplessness in dealing with some corruption issues at a press conference last month, has redeemed his image with this. (How he has redeemed? What is choice but then not to accept it? Redeemed he would have, had he accepted it before SC called his action as ‘Illegal’. Pankaj is it this hard to understand? ) He is also perhaps the first PM to accept a mistake upfront. (NOW name one Prime Minister whose actions/appointment was held ‘ILLEGAL’ prior to this?) He has tried to scotch speculation that since many decisions were taken elsewhere, his government could not be held accountable. He has shown that if there is a decision taken, even if at the behest of those in the party, the government will not shirk its responsibility for any error of judgement (Error of Judgment???) that it may make. It’s also an indication to the party that it shouldn’t push for issues or cases which may not stand up to judicial scrutiny. (Indirectly he means that now on CON party should be careful on procedures even if they appoint another Tainted one!)

The apex court has come out with flying colours by upholding the rule of law. In that context, the quashing of Thomas’s appointment must be seen as a victory for democracy rather than as a defeat for the government or a triumph for the opposition parties. There are certain issues where individual parties take secondary place since it’s democracy and our values which emerge stronger. (Supreme Court has done its duty and very well too. Kudos!)

Singh’s action also proves that had PV Narasimha Rao accepted his responsibility for the demolition of the Babri masjid, the plight of his party wouldn’t have been so dismal in the years that followed his exit from government. Mulayam Singh Yadav, by dissociating himself from Kalyan Singh after the 2009 parliamentary polls, also accepted his mistake in not putting his Samajwadi Party on a secular course. (What is relevance? But then dragging PVNR in everything and blackening Him is CON practice. Sic!) Similarly, Sonia Gandhi overturned the Congress thesis of going it alone in August 2003 to forge a coalition, which finally came to power in 2004. She realised that going it alone at that stage was a mistake and that the Congress had to reinvent itself in the coalition era. Her judgement yielded many political dividends for the party. (Pure political opportunism as is clear to all and any but to Chamcha In Chief, Pankaj Vohara.)

Politicians should not always have colossal egos. They must own up to their mistakes. They are not gods and should act with humility. While there could be many question marks regarding the future of the present government in view of several scams, it is heartening to note that the PM has realised that he is the last port of call. Between us.

Now that was Pankaj Vohra for you. Now why did ManMohan Singh appoint P J Thomas despite objections from LOP and subsequent ‘quashing’ of appointment by Supreme Court? An excerpt from Aashok Malik’s this post ‘A Curious Choice’ might interest you.

Of course, the issue of principle is linked to that of personality. In arguing its case, the UPA government cited a precedent from 1999, when a committee comprising the then PM and home minister (both BJP), Lok Sabha speaker (Telugu Desam) and leaders of the Opposition in the two Houses of Parliament (both Congress) chose the chairman of the National Human Rights Commission. The Congress representatives proposed Justice AH Ahmadi. They were outvoted by the others, who opted for Justice JS Verma.

In invoking this example, the UPA made its point about unanimity being ideal but not mandatory. Even so, it let slip a decidedly clumsy comparison. Ahmadi has had a mixed record since leaving the Supreme Court. He was controversial as chair of the trust governing the Bhopal Memorial Hospital set up by Union Carbide for victims of the 1984 gas leak. It has been alleged that patients at the hospital — survivors of the gas leak — were subjected to drug trials by pharmaceutical companies without their consent. This would make Ahmadi an odd choice for any sort of human rights capacity. In contrast, Verma is cherished as among India’s finest jurists. As with Thomas, why did the Congress believe Justice Ahmadi was more suitable than anyone else? The answer would be fascinating.

Prudent Indian.

Read Full Post »

Yatha Guru Tatha Chela.

 

Madari-Roadside-Entertainer-With-Dancing-Monkey

Madari-Roadside-Entertainer-With-Dancing-Monkey

 

If you ever wondered how shameless, duplicitous, cunning one can be! Then surely you have not met a true CONman yet.

On October 6th, 2010. Rahul Gandhi (40 years old Middle Aged) Clown Prince of CON party once again shot his mouth off and equated RSS with SIMIMiddle Aged Clown Prince with serious ‘foot in mouth’ disease is reported to have parroted the lie his CON party has been peddling for years. Middle Aged Clown Prince said and I quote,

“Both these organisations have hardline fundamentalist ideologies.”

When pointed out to 40 years Old Middle Aged Clown Prince that SIMI is a ‘proscribed’ organization while RSS is not, the Scion of CON party said and I quote,

“…both these organisations preach fundamentalist ideologies. That’s a fact and nothing is going to change that fact,”

Rahul Middle Aged Gandhi is not to be blamed for this gaffe and/or outright stupendous statement. Well, at least I give him benefit of ‘Ignorance’. I never expect any ‘sensible’ thing from him even. Since the Middle Aged man has neither grown up ‘mentally’ nor has become Man enough to think independently still.

This reflects truly the ‘mantel’ of this 40 years Old Middle Aged man whom the Paid Media Maharathis has been projecting as ‘future PM’ of India. Sic!

But then Rahul just ‘parroted’ what has been tutored to him by The Most CON man of CON party –Digvijay Singh. Who has been given the ‘onerous’ task of making Rahul a true CON prince.

‘Yatha Guru Tatha Chela’ is an old Indian wisdom. With a Teacher as shameless, duplicitous and cunning as Diggy Raja is, will Rahul be any different? Sic!

Recently on Karan Thapar’s Devils’ Advocate the ‘UGLIEST’ face of CON man came to fore. Not that we didn’t know it- only this time it is well recorded. Watch Just how shameless this man is!

Watch This…

Two Three quick points …

- Diggy Raja (Loathsome CON man) accuses RSS because ‘alleged’ Hindu Terrorists had RSS background thus blame RSS, but CON party is not to be blamed for Sikh Massacre perpetrated by CON party GOONS under Rajiv Gandhi’s Watch?

- For this Sick CON man planting bomb is terror act (which indeed is) but dragging out innocent Sikhs Men, Women, Children on to streets and put on fire ALIVE is not terror act!!!! SICK IS HE NOT???

- Further all those who he names as Hindu terrorists and ‘implicated’ are yet to be convicted. While CON party REWARDED Tytler with Ministry and Sajjan is still not convicted even after 25 years.

- This bugger is just ‘sorry’ for GENOCIDE OF SIKH MEN, WOMEN, CHILDREN who were butchered since it happened after math of Indira’s assassination!

- This loathsome man doesn’t find killing 3000 SIKHS by CON goons as an act of COMMUNAL terror!

- This CON Man visited the houses of SIMI terrorists killed in Batala House encounter but has no tear for Inspector M C Sharma who sacrificed life in line of duty!

SICK! SICK! SICK!

Forewarning/Forecasting : This loathsome CON man- Diggy Raja- could become ( if I believe whispers in New Delhi’s corridors of Power) an interregnum Prime Minister some time in 2012 when your President PP retires and Mata’s Prime Minion MMS shifts to Rashtrapati  Bhawan. BEWARE.

Hope will be around to see if I am right or not.

PI.

Read Full Post »

Prime Minion among all Minions of Mata Balidaan Moorti.

Prime Minion among all Minions of Mata Balidaan Moorti.

Just about anything and everything related with CWG are bringing us – a Billion Strong Nation –just one thing day in night out :  #SHAME #SHAME AND #SHAME.

I am infuriated with the CON men/women/Babas and Babe Minions of Mata Balidaan Moorti led by the ‘servile’ Prime Minion ManMohan Singh a man who is ‘Alleged’ to be ‘Honest’.

HUH! Honest my foot.

# CWG has become symbolic about all most everything that is rotten; corrupt to core, inefficient irresponsible, unaccountable, negligent, shameless, non governance this United Progressive Alliance II represents.

I am not surprised if foreigners found a Dog shitting on his bed when I see them all around me shitting all over the place (!) Albeit all are not dogs.

On Tweeter many friends rightly pointed out that Mani Shankar Aiyaar is the man most responsible. Absolutely right, this ‘gas bag’ deliberately delayed the CWG work to almost sabotaging it. His Marxists leanings were well reflected in his belief of ‘Sabotaging the system from within. He is ‘the’ loathsome politician most of us watch in typical Hindi Movies.

But then, is he alone to be blamed for? NO? To be fair, Maverick Aiyaar never concealed his contempt for the CWG neither he sat with lips sealed, he had been vocal throughout in his criticism of this ‘Tamasha’. Knowing his attitude and the prestige (whatever) attached with this International Event what would any Concerned, Prudent Prime Minister have done? After all in the Indian scheme of Governance it is the Prime Minister’s prerogative and responsibility to oversee who heads a ministry and how. No?

BUT, what did this Prime Minion of Sonia do? The Prime Minion just allowed this ‘Joker’ in the Ministry whose prime responsibility is/was to plan, execute and oversee preparations for CWG! Sic! For full TWO YEARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WTF was the Prime Minion waiting for? Either the Prime Minion was hand in glove with Mani Shankar and wanted to sabotage CWG OR was he just as usual Indifferent! What else explains this inordinate negligence to shunt this reluctant Minister out from the Ministry?

Obviously this inordinate delay on part of the Prime Minion to take just ONE small step, CWG projects were delayed – thus astronomically inflating prices/costs and resulting in shoddy planning and pathetic execution on all and every front.

A look at all who are/were involved in this ‘extravaganza’ and benefited financially. Almost every agency involved in #CWG –barring MCD- is directly controlled by CON party men/women. MCD is governed by BJP but had almost negligible role to play – so some respite for BJP, much to chagrin of CON paid MSM or they would have pinned all blame on the ‘Communal Party’. J

Point that I am trying to drive is: Why blame Kalmadi alone? Why Kalmadi has become a face of all and everything that is wrong with CWG? This farce is not Kalmadi’s doing though I give him no ‘Clean Chit’.

The Root of this mess lies deep somewhere else and Suresh Kalmadi is just made a villain of #CWG. WRONG it is to PIN all blame on SK (he is no Saint and is equally culpable) equally wrong it would be to pin down Mani Shankar too. Get to the root; these two are just offshoots of a Branch. The Malaise is much deeper and not very far away from 7 RCR and 10 JP. Period.

Much has been said in Media about ASIAD 82. I remember, I  was very young then and in the same year my Immediate Cousin was born and we named him ‘Appu’.  The Paid MSM has been attributing success of that to Rajiv Gandhi – true to some extent -  but Jagmohan Ji was at the hub of all that. I have no hesitation to admit that both Indira and Rajiv did a reasonably good job. BUT THEN BOTH WERE INDIANS.

Worst is:  we have a Prime Minion whose sole objective has been to just keep on hanging to ‘Her Majesty’s  Pallu’. What else you expect from a man who’s only OBJECTIVE has ever been to ‘ensure retirement benefits’.

Prime Minion people say is the most ‘Honest’ and a man of ‘Integrity’!!!!!!!!!!!

Fail to understand on Prime Minion’s  ‘Honesty’ quotient as he…

Allows A Raja to keep looting public money?

Allows Laloo to fudge accounts as Minister for Railways in UPA I?

Allows CON party to keep plundering loot in the name of CWG?

Allows all ‘Aam Adami’ to be screwed over prices?

The List is endless as far as the Prime Minion’s ‘Honesty Quotient’ is concerned. ‘Honest’? My Foot!

As far as Prime Minion’s Integrity to Mata Sonia is concerned: It is absolute and final. Make no mistake.

He will STAKE EVEN THE HONOR OF BHARAT IN THE SERVICE OF MAA BALIDAAN MOORTI BUT WILL MAKE NO COMPROMISE ON MATA’S INTEREST ESPECIALLY FINANCIAL.

Make no Mistake when he is ‘touted’ as the Best ‘Economist’ ever – though you and me are bleeding through noses and A*** for making ends meet = he still is the ‘Best’ for those with whom his ‘integrity’ lies.

Bhay Ho!

PI.

PS: Before you accuse Kalmadi or any, do get to root cause.

Read Full Post »

Why should not we question Rajiv Gandhi’s complicity in Bhopal aftermath Mr. Manish Tiwari? What is ‘unpatriotic’ about it?

Why should not we question Rajiv Gandhi’s complicity in Bhopal aftermath Mr. Manish Tiwari? What is ‘unpatriotic’ about it?

CONgress party is full of too ‘clever by half Lawyers’ of all hues, colors, size and sexes. Manish Tiwari MP from Ludiana, Punjab is one of them. Unfortunately for him he is also spokesman for the party which more often than not, finds self in a soup.

CONgress has been facing flak from all directions for its ‘confirmed’ role in making Warren Anderson escape for good from the law of land. Now since we all know almost every detail about his arrest, flight to New Delhi by MP Govt’s state plane. It is also in public knowledge that the then foreign secretary had arranged a meeting of his (Warren Anderson) with the then President Giani Zail Singh and then Home Minister PV Narsimha Rao. Thereafter he was allowed to fly back to the safe and secure confines of his Home back in USA.

Now all the above are facts which even the CONgress is not denying and so are the sequences of events too are not challenged by them either. Main players are all CONgress men too. Both @ centre and in MP CONgress party was in power. So what and where is the confusion and why responsibility for letting off WA is not fixed? Here it is where CONgress party is in a dilemma.

Dilemma is: How to salvage Rajiv Gandhi’s reputation or whatever is left of that. Because all fingers lead to only one direction – for this all sordid drama around arrest of WA and thereafter   allowed to go free- and that is in Rajiv Gandhi’s. No one is willing to buy that Arjun Singh acted on his own and Rajiv had nothing to do with it. Rajiv had Foreign portfolio too so it is bizarre to think he knew nothing when his own Foreign Secretary was involved? And this I say assuming he didn’t know as PM then!But then, this ‘excuse’ again is not a good reflection on him. If I remember right then he was President of CONgress party too.

To make matters worse CONgress party leaders outwit other fellow CON men by issuing statements of all types of contradictory to others. But most damning one is from one PM (Pranab Muherjee) who would never be PM (Prime Minister). This is a subject of one full blog, some other time. Pranab Da made a statement that Arjun Singh took this decision to send WA out of Bhopal for worsening Law and Order situation in the city. It is laughable even if we believe this was the case. But then India is huge and they could have locked up WA anywhere safe and presented to court.

In short, CONgress and its minions are finding it extremely difficult to sound ‘authentic’ while trying to salvage Rajiv Gandhi’s sullied image. Matters become worse as Madame Sonia ‘Maino’ Gandhi’s pleasure is supreme most for CON men/women/Babas and Babes to ‘survive’ in party and share loot of public money. Hence the frustration. Frustration is more palpable for those who have to appear on 24X7 Nuisance channels as spokesperson for the Gandhi ‘Familia’.

Frustration and confusion is very hard to miss on the faces of Jayanti Natrajan and Manish Tiwari while defending indefensible. This despite the fact that, PadamShris Anchors of 24X7 Nuisance Channels are ‘equally’ sympathetic, if not more to the Madame. To wriggle out of this very difficult situation these spokespersons have resorted to ‘inanities’ of all hues.

Latest one is from Liar Lawyer spokesman of CONgress Mr. Manish Tiwari. :)  Mr. Manish says that,

“Those blaming Rajiv Gandhi on Bhopal issue not patriotic”.

Now this is rich, indeed! Since when questing a PM has become synonyms with Patriotism?

Manish says,

“Rajiv Gandhi or his government had nothing to do with it. It is baseless and cheap to insinuate that a Prime Minister, who had to sacrifice his mother just one and half month ago (before assuming his office) and then sacrificed his own life five years later for the nation’s integrity, allowed somebody to escape out of the country under any pressure (from the US),”

Please note,

“a Prime Minister, who had to sacrifice his mother just one and half month ago (before assuming his office) and then sacrificed his own life” :)

If this is what are his drafting skills than Lawyer Manish’s clients better be aware. :)

Now look at another gem from one All India Women Congress chief Prabha Thakur! In a statement she strongly objected to Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi seeking a reply from Congress President Sonia Gandhi on the Bhopal issue.

She says,

“Modi’s move to seek a reply from Gandhi on this issue is a cheap attempt to mislead people of the country… people know that Gandhi had no connection with politics 25 years ago,”

Outright Stupid! Sonia is now the Whole Sole Mallik of CONgress party and it is in this capacity she should clarify her CONgress party and Rajiv Gandhi’s (then PM and her late Husband) role and complicity in whole saga.

Idiocy of the LadyThakur is amazing! She says,

“They are now politicising the issue, which is like applying salt instead of balm to the wounds of the victims. People know Modi’s politics of baking bread on the pyres.”

May I ask these CONgress spokes person one question? What is to politicize? These stupid parrots each time when u ask them ‘Do not politicize issue’. Be it rising prices, foreign policy blunders, ministers corruption, farmers suicide, subversion of democratic institutions or/and anything which is directly related to public and affects them, These worthies have a stock reply ‘do not politicize’. What to politicize then, Idiots? Yours or my ass? Huh!

Her reference to Narrender Bhai Modi as

People know Modi’s politics of baking bread on the pyres.”

Her own rhetoric Boomerang on her and CONgress. It was CONgress party PM and CM who traded tragic death of 15000 INDIANS by setting free A FOREIGNER who was and is principally responsible for their deaths. Sonia led CONgress had let go Italian Mr. Q too.

Country has a right to know WHY and for HOW MUCH CON party’s PM and CM traded off 15000 dead Indians keeping the interest of Foreigner Businessman’s interest over dead INDIANS.

Sonia ‘Maino’ Gandhi will have to answer better sooner than later.

If questioning Rajiv Gandhi is ‘unpatriotic’ so I am unpatriotic like billion plus others. I do not need a certificate from a MORON like Manish Tiwari Huh!  Period.

PI.

Ps: Meanwhile CONgress spokespersons keep making fool of selves please. :)

Read Full Post »

Dow shall be liable

Dow shall be liable

The year 1984 has been a year full of unfortunate happenings affecting the trajectory of India adversely for long time to come.  The year was most bloodiest since 1947.

Just a look at 1984 the year it was.

June 3-6 Operation Blue Star.

The most sacred place of Sikhs, Golden Temple was raided by Armed Forces to hound and hunt Jarnail Singh Bhinderwal – a Frankenstein of Indira Gandhi’s  own creation to outwit Akalis – resulting in Huge loss of human lives both Civil and Army Jawans; massive destruction to the Temple Complex and very wounded psyche of otherwise brave and patriotic Sikh Community.

Nov. 31th. Indira Gandhi Assassination.

Then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was brutally murdered by her own Sikh Guards.

Nov. 31st to December 4.

Following Indira’s assassination, Cong party goons brutally dragged Sikhs out on streets and were set on fire. I saw this with my own eyes on Delhi streets. Over 3000 Sikhs who had nothing to do with Indira’s murder were burnt alive, only because they shared religion with those who killed Indira!

All this happened under Rajiv Gandhi’s watch.

Till date no one has been punished instead some of those who led Mobs and directed killing of Sikhs were rewarded with Minister Ship by Rajiv and subsequent Congress Governments. Sic!

Intervening night of 2 and 3rd December. Bhopal.

On this fateful night over 15,000 men/women/ children and countless cattle /birds/animals breathed Poisonous methyl isocyanate while asleep and never woke up again. One of the biggest Industrial accidents it was.

Now, I recounted all above mentioned incidents/accidents because in all above there is a common link and that is: Congress. Indira Gandhi had popularized ‘Foreign Hand’ theory in about almost every thing where and when she wanted to deflect people’s attention from her own follies. It is the same party’s HAND which is visible.

Now, although Bhopal Tragedy wasn’t Congress made/engineered but the disaster management post Gas leak was a disaster of its own magnitude. Right from relief to investigating to apprehending culprits to even filing court case and bringing culprits to book- the HAND of Con party is all too visible.

Be it for Political reasons/gains or Monetary, Con party had/have no compunctions in shortchanging interest of people – so called Aam Adami – it claims to represent.

If CHACHA Ji’s singly minded pursuance of ‘his own tryst with destiny’, led to partition of Bharat. Then Indira’s cynical and manipulative politics of up man ship led to not only her own gruesome end but to most Horrendous Massacre of Sikhs. Prime Minion of Sonia calls Gujarat Post Godhra riots as Holocaust but keeps mum on this! Sic! (Read this please)

Rajiv Gandhi then Prime Minister not only presided over the Killings of Sikhs by party goons but justified it too. All those who led mobs to kill Sikhs were rewarded with Ministerial berths, Governors etc. 26 years has passed since but not one Culprit has been punished! Sic!

Arjun Singh as CM of Madya Pradesh then in 1984, personally ensured that Warren Anderson comes to no harm and was safely escorted out of country even when his complicity in Bhopal Tragedy was apparent to all. The same fossil minded Arjun Singh not long ago had called all Sikhs as murderers of Indira! Sic! (Read this)

Yesterday Bhopal court pronounced a judgment in the Bhopal Gas Tragedy. Expectantly it is ‘too little too late’. Why I say ‘expectantly’? Is because the case filed by CBI was diluted and filed under not so stringent laws, so this judgment was on expected lines, why blame the Judge? Blame lies elsewhere in Con party’s hand.

I am disappointed with Courts too. Had they wanted they could have expedited or minimum would have asked Government /CBI to file under stringent laws? After all Judiciary has every now and then shown their fangs what is called as ‘Judicial activism’!

I am not ranting against Con Party, but I write all this to make you realize how bad the things were and still are. This all I write in utter frustration as nothing has improved since then. And new government ‘allegedly’ led by Prime Minion of Sonia  is no better than earlier Con governments if not worst.

Deeply Anguished.

PI.

Read Full Post »

Devil’s Advocate:  LKM, IPL & ‘Scary Clowns’ behind curtains.

LKM, IPL & 'Scary Clowns'.

LKM, IPL & 'Scary Clowns'.

It has been a week but the sordid IPL drama refuses to die down. What started as a Minister caught with his hands in jar and subsequently made to quit office has taken a bizarre turn.

My brief notes on some key issues.

1. It is stupid to equate Shashi and Modi as MSM has been trying to.

Shashi being MOS is accountable to citizens and since it is reasonably clear that he misused his office to benefit his lady friend is guilty in public eye. As for Modi, well he is accountable to authorities concerned if he has done some murky dealings.

If Modi is corrupt- if only for argument sake and since he doesn’t hold public office too – how does it absolve Shashi, who has misused public office!

Shashi had to go and did eventually, but he could have salvaged his reputation by resigning voluntarily. As for Mata Ji and Prime Minister Minion of Mata Ji’s stand on corruption is concerned- do not kid me please :). Not long ago Prime Minister Minion of Mata Ji had felicitated fellow ‘country man’ of Mata Ji to flee away with slush money.

2. IPL issue rocks Parliament.

Raising IPL issue in Parliament would have made sense only if Shashi had not resigned. Then it would have been legitimate for MPs to question Shashi and his presence in the cabinet. But now it was a sorry spectacle to see MPs of all hues splitting hair on something which is anything but a matter of National Interest. Speeches by Laloos and alkies made Parliament and MPs look stupid not only to all Indians but to the entire World.

3. Media. Twists and Spins.

MSM legitimately has every right to highlight any issue which has element of public interest involved. IPL as a national attraction and Shashi as a minister both warranted attention and scrutiny of MSM. And to be fair, MSM did a good job and hope shall continue to put the entire IPL under microscopic scrutiny without sparing anyone.

BUT then here is the cliché. MSM would just stop short of naming anyone which/who could prove embarrassing for their favorite party and threaten this Govt.

NO. I am not making any wild allegation against the Main Stream Media. I am stating a fact please read on shall elaborate after couple of sentences since I am trying to make my arguments in a structured manner.

4. Hounding Lalit Kumar Modi.

a.)  Soon after Shashi was discarded to the dustbin of history, MSM and their political masters  shifted focus and their collective wrath is unleashed on LKM. LKM made the Govt it’s enemy by making public MOS Shashi’s ‘dangerous liaisons’ and ‘sweat money’ deals for ‘sweetheart’. It was LKM’s major folly. Although LKM drew first blood but he grossly misjudged CONgress party’s vendetta politics.

b.)   MSM too has joined this cacophony for two reasons. One- MSM know the public interest in IPL and Two- since MSM by hounding LKM need to justify and earn their Padam Shris they were awarded in advance  by Mata Sonia ‘Maino’ Gandhi.

5. Well! Is LKM a Saint?

I have no reason to believe so or otherwise till all facts are out in public domain. And no way am I defending him either. I am just making notes as I see things are unfolding. BUT it would be injustice to LKM if we ignore his efforts and enterprising skills to make IPL a leading Global Brand. Being a student of management, I salute him.

I believe if IT and ED do their work unbiased and without any malicious intent, he might come out clean. BUT then key words are UNBIASED, without any Prejudice and malicious intent.

Will it be so? :) Come on! None of us is so naïve.

6. How will the whole controversy end?

ONE basic fact.

IPL is too big a money machine for all, Cricket administrators, sponsors, cricketers, politicians, MSM, franchise owners and fans too. So IPL will stay as it is in the interest of all. I believe IPL also benefits many fringe players like Hospitality industry, Tourism, Travel and many many more. In short it does give an opportunity for everyone to benefit directly or indirectly.

MY PREDICTION.

You need not be a ‘Political Pundit’ to figure out how will this whole drama end. I stick my neck out and predict…

@ 1.)  Govt would unleash all its might on BCCI (as Pranab announced) and in matter of no time will have thick enough dossier on everybody especially Sharad Pawar and Prafful Patel .

@ 2.) Outside public glare (but with complicit MSM quoting ‘secretive sources’ and leaking ‘selective disinformation’) these dossiers would then be used to blackmail and to force LKM being thrown out. Thus Mata Ji avenged. MSM pleased. BCCI Honchos back to business.

@ 3.) Govt would then Publicly announce some committee or other and probe would go on till cows come home- then soon a new issue would replace this one for ‘Tweepple’ to Tweet and for me to Blog.

Ps: Well, I think LKM too would be accommodated one way or another, after all he is too important and know really too much. But at the same time I am really worried too for LKM as he ‘really knows too much’. Politicians and vested interests do not really like those who know too much about them. This is most ‘scary part’.

PI.

Read Full Post »

Perfidious Media’ v/s Narrender Modi

Perfidious Media’ v/s Narrender Modi

Hate Modi is an industry and many have benefited from it (except State Congress). MSM Maharathis have earned selves ‘Padam Shris’ from Sonia ‘Maino’ Gandhi for defaming NaMo and for spreading lies.Some NGOs made a carrer out of it. But then truth has a habbit of surfacing and here too it surfaces, once again. Need we trust ‘Perfidious Media’ again?

Narendra Modi’s open letter to the nation about SIT’s summons to him and NaMo’s alleged non compliance as ‘propagated‘ by ‘Perfidious Media’.

Full text of letter is as follow.

My beloved countrymen,

Namaskar,

I am constrained to write to you with a deep sense of anguish. Since last eight years, canards have been spread against me. For the past one week, if we analyse the allegations leveled against me, then the truth will become evident. Truth cannot be suppressed. It is now my duty to place before you the facts that brings out the importance of understanding what the truth really is.

After the 2002 Godhra incidents, I had categorically said in the Vidhan Sabha and in public that no one is above the Indian Constitution and the law, even if he happens to be the chief minister of a state. These are not mere words. My actions have reflected this statement in its true spirit.  I assure you that this will be my stand in the future.

In spite of that, some vested interests, without losing a single opportunity and with malicious pleasure and without bothering to ascertain the truth based on mere whims and fancies, have been tarnishing the good image of Gujarat, my government and me.

Recently, there has been a systematic campaign to defame Gujarat through propagation of false reports titled ‘Special Investigation Team (SIT) summons Narendra Modi’; ‘Narendra Modi did not appear before SIT’ and ‘Modi has shown disrespect to Supreme Court and SIT’. Such baseless allegations are being leveled once again against me to defame Gujarat.

I am therefore compelled to place the facts before my countrymen.

FACTS:

As soon as newspapers began reporting that Modi has been summoned by the SIT, the government spokesperson immediately said that Shri Modi is bound by the law of the land and the Indian Constitution. He has always extended his cooperation to every procedure of law. And he is committed to do so in the future.

It is a matter of grave concern and needs investigation as to why and who started spreading lies that ‘SIT summons Narendra Modi on March 21, 2010′.

The purveyors of untruth failed even to think that March 21, 2010 happens to be a Sunday and a public holiday.

These purveyors of lies even did not once bother to check whether the key SIT officers, who are appointed by the Supreme Court, were present in Gujarat on March 21, 2010.

SIT had not fixed March 21, 2010 for my appearance. To say that I was summoned on March 21 is completely false. I shall respond to the SIT fully respecting the law and keeping in view the dignity of a body appointed by the Supreme Court.

The date of 21st March 2010 was invented by some vested interest and as a part of their effort to interfere in the due process of law. They wanted to paint me as a person who refused to respond to the SIT. This country has in the last twenty four hours witnessed a campaign of disinformation in which a section of the media became an instrument of the disinformers. I hope this section will now take corrective steps.

My beloved countrymen,

The people of Gujarat and this country have identified those who are defaming Gujarat continuously since 2002. But I want to tell the truth; spreading falsehoods has only one single purpose and that is to instigate people. It is a sinful action which will harm the working of a democratic state.  Seen in the backdrop of events in the last 24 hours, it shows that there is a nexus among the vested interests in spreading lies against me, in order to defame me. This machination has come unstuck and the people have seen through this charade.

The government of Gujarat has always honoured and cooperated with the investigative agencies, commissions and Supreme Court looking into Godhra and post-Godhra incidents.  And that is why I never thought of giving a public statement on this issue.

Despite unbearable pain, I decided to maintain silence in the belief that the due process of law would take its own course.

But now, as the lies reach a crescendo as never before, I am compelled to bring the facts before the countrymen. I also consider it my humble duty.

I hope the truth is not twisted by the purveyors of untruth to misguide the investigation. And I expect that the media would bring my deep pain and despair to the notice of the people.

Thanks,

Narendra Modi

Read Full Post »

Smiling Sonia Tamed MMS

Smiling Sonia Tamed MMS

It is the worst kept secrete that big names of Indian polity, Industry, Top Bureaucrats and Even Media Persons have stashed billions of Dollars/Euros/Francs etc in those Swiss Banks numbered accounts.

Corruption flows from top and trickles down to lower rung. Arrest corruption at top and no body at lower level can dare to get corrupt. BJP in the run-up to the elections 2009 had made claims to retrieve the ill-gotten monies of Indian stashed away in the safe lockers of Switzerland. BJP lost elections and so the issue died.

I fail to understand why BJP is quite on the Connection between KGB, Monies and Madame Sonia ‘Maino’ Gandhi. Why does BJP not take cudgels on the behalf of Billion Indians? Why are they silent even when there are ample proofs of Sonia’s involvement?

May be writer is right “The government remained silent. But so did all the opposition parties! Why? Are the opposition leaders themselves also vulnerable and compelled to maintain discreet silence? Draw your own conclusions.”

Now that the Sonia’s Prime Minion would do nothing which might harm His Master neither the 24X7 Prefidious Media would ask her any uncomfortable questions lest their ‘Secularism gets diluted. In any case these MahaRathis of MSM has already been bought over by awarding Padama Shris and Bhushans.

But  why the Hell BJP being the leading opposition party is silent on this? BJP needs to answer and answer it soon

PI.

Dr Swami some time back had said this. See the Video here.

Now Outlook has published this story here- reproducing in full which leaves none in any doubt.

Is Sonia Above Questioning?

If the BJP is serious about fighting corruption there is no dearth of issues. Take the case of ‘payments in US dollars to the family members of Mr. Rajiv Gandhi, namely Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Ms Paola Maino, mother of Sonia Gandhi’

Rajinder Puri

The BJP has taken up the secret Indian Swiss bank money issue. Does it seriously contemplate recovering the money? Or is it just a poll gimmick? Recall the party’s somersault on the Indo-US Nuclear-Deal. If the deal destroys national security, why have Arun Shourie and Yashwant Sinha not resigned? Are they political opportunists? Do they or don’t they really intend to deliver results on the Swiss money? If the BJP is serious about fighting corruption there is no dearth of issues. Take one glaring example.

On August 15, 2006 this scribe wrote: “Dr. Yevgeniya Albats is a Soviet journalist who …was appointed as member of the official KGB Commission set up by President Yeltsin in 1991. She had full access to secret files of the KGB. She authored a book, The State within a State: KGB and Its Hold on Russia …. Dr. Albats disclosed in her book that KGB chief Victor Chebrikov in December 1985 had sought in writing from the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), ‘authorization to make payments in US dollars to the family members of Mr. Rajiv Gandhi, namely Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Ms Paola Maino, mother of Sonia Gandhi.’ CPSU payments were authorized by a resolution, CPSU/CC/No 11228/3 dated 20/12/1985; and endorsed by the USSR Council of Ministers in Directive No. 2633/Rs dated 20/12/1985. These payments had been coming since 1971, as payments received by Sonia Gandhi’s family, and ‘have been audited in CPSU/CC resolution No. 11187/22 OP dated 10/12/1984.’

“In 1992 the media confronted the Russian government with the Albats disclosure. The Russian government confirmed the veracity of the disclosure and defended it as necessary for ‘Soviet ideological interest’. The Hindu of July 4, 1992 carried this report….In November 1991 the respected Swiss magazine, Schweitzer Illustrate, published a report alleging that Rajiv Gandhi had 2.5 billion Swiss francs, equivalent roughly to two billion US dollars, in numbered Swiss bank accounts….Surely, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi owes herself and the nation an emphatic and effective rebuttal of the Albats charges?”

On November 8 2006 I again wrote: “…Until now there has been only deafening silence from Mrs. Gandhi and the Congress party….If the Albats allegation published in a reputed research book is false, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi should promptly deny it. Otherwise, her silence could be perceived as assent.”

The government remained silent. But so did all the opposition parties! Why? Are the opposition leaders themselves also vulnerable and compelled to maintain discreet silence? Draw your own conclusions.


Read Full Post »

Updated Feb,26th.2010: Thanks to reader sarathy.amudhan for providing the photographs.

Capt-Devinder-Singh-Jass

Capt-Devinder-Singh-Jass

Naik-Selva-Kumar and other Brave Hearts

Naik-Selva-Kumar and Imtiyaz Ahmad Thokar

Just as we are supping ‘Tea with Terrorists’ (Indo Pak FS level Talks) at Hyderabad House one brave Indian soldier would be on his last journey, not very far from the place.

I am appalled to see that no ‘Sec-Soc’ 24X7 Nuisance Indian Channels have shown courtesy to spare few moments for Martyred Captian Davendra Singh Jass.

Yesterday we saw how these 24X7 Nuisance Channels were ecstatic about Sachin’s 200 runs in Gawalior ODI. Not that I have anything against Sachin or his feat being celebrated. No not at all.

If Sachin is a hero- which indeed he is- then Captain Davendra Singh Jass is as great a hero if not Greater.

Captain Davendra Singh Jass a 26 year old brave man sacrificed his life fighting Islamic Terrorists in Kashmir and yet ONE BILLION SELFISH AND THANKLESS Indians and our 24X7 Nuisance Channels have no courtesy to spare some time in his memory!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What A Shame!

Captain Davendra Singh Jass: An IIIT alumnus and student of Management gave up his lucrative career and choose to serve the Nation and this is how the Nation treats him?

Shame is the only word which comes to my mind.

This PI salutes the Brave Captain Davendra Singh Jass and hope someday this Thankless One Billion Strong Nation would learn to treat the ‘Real Heroes’ with respect and honor they deserve.

PI.

ps: Can’t find any pic of him on net, readers please update me if u find please.

Read Full Post »

24X7 Lies

24X7 Lies

Needless to say that Indian Media especially the 24X7 TV News channels abandoned their primary duty of informing people and keeping a close eye on the Government and establishment- long ago. Long ago ‘Sec-Soc’ MSM realized that more than ‘ethics’ it is money which is more important. Money is made if you have power, power is derived from proximity to the ‘Powerful’ i.e. those who are in position to either reward/award or punish you.

Simply put, if you are close to the Govt. establishment, you are powerful. And power begets Money and more power. But to remain in the good books of powers to be, one need to compromise with ethics, and MSM has no qualms in doing that.

Just for your ‘enlightenment‘ I reproduce what Shri Shri Padam Shri Rajdeep Sardesai said. His own words, with my inputs.

Another reason for the problem is the changing self-image of the journalist, and his role in a democratic system. For a long time the journalist’s role was seen to be that of an independent observer of events. But observation alone can be rather tedious and not very financially productive either. So, over the years, the journalist has chosen to move from the margins of the fourth estate to being firmly on the centre stage, closer to the first estate (Read first family Soinia ‘Maino’ Gandhi’). Ideological corruption is as much a part in this process as anything else. A journalist can get close to a political party (Read Congress), business house (Read Reliance Mukesh Ambani Group) or an individual (Read Guru Amar Singh then in 2007, Sant Singh Chatwal Now) in a manner that compromises his (Read the journalists) independence. Having acquired that proximity (With Congress and the Maino family), the journalist can then use his clout on a larger scale, playing kingmaker in cementing political alliances (By not telecasting tapes of the STING his channel commissioned) at the centre or in providing the (Help winning the political and/ or pay masters) link between a minister in the Union cabinet (?) and a business house (We all know, who.) in need of a favor. (Padam Shri!)

Now we know MSM better! Don’t we?

But my this post is not about to tell you what games MSM play, you all know too well. This post is about a story which should have made the headlines and should have been debated threadbare, as the subsequent consequences are of national ramifications. MSM has been too busy in promoting ‘SRK’ and ‘His Name Is Khan’ that they have no time, energy or inclination to report anything else. This is their priority these days!

Thanks to some really Good, Alert and sincere bloggers, this issue has been brought to the notice of public.

To give you a quick review, One Mulla and his accomplice Guddu hack down 8 (all Hindus) poor farm laborers mercilessly in 1995 for failing to pay ransom of Rs. 10,000 each. Now as this is ‘rarest of rare’ cases logically these two (Mulla and Guddu) should have been awarded ‘capital punishment’ Na? Absolutely yes.

But Honorable Supreme Court overturned the death sentence citing the mitigating factor of poverty. This case is very important for the simple reason that it has the potential of influencing the criminal justice dispensation. But for Alert Bloggers Barabarindian and Reality Check India this news would have been buried in the pages of some news papers.

Read and ponder: Reality Check India’s Mulla Vs State of UP, Poverty, Death March, and Justice and Barabarindian’s Justice gets a Secular angle. Just read the ‘brutality’ of the crime. Both Reality Check and Barabarindians have enlightened take on the issue.

While MSM and their Padam Shris are more interested in making money and earning awards there are bloggers like Barabarindians, Reality Check and many more who are doing much better and selfless job in keeping the Nation informed. Kudos to them.

Instead of recognizing and appreciating the bloggers for their work MSM has nothing but contempt for us bloggers. Not long ago Padam Shri Barkhs Dutt Ji had made one hapless ‘Kunte’ not only withdraw a post (regarding MSM role during 26/11) but threatened him with law cases. Barkha Dutt Ko Gussa Kyon Aata Hai, we all know. Another day the Mighty Vir Sanghvi too had lamented against bloggers. These two are not alone but everybody in MSM has few pebbles to throw at the bloggers. So be it, damn we care.

But friends you now know who you can trust most: bloggers like Barabarindian, Reality Check or MSM?

My forewarning: Trust MSM @ your own Peril.

PI.

Read Full Post »

I am not sure what and how much Islam has contributed to the modern science, but sure I am that the religion of Piece (no spell mistake) has used science to perfect the art of killing Kafirs.

I do not blame Muslims as this is what has been mandated by their Allah and his ‘piece’ loving Messenger. Killing us all is their religious duty and  nothing stops them from discharging their religious duty.

We all have heard of Human Bombs but they just do not stop here they have invented or are working on to perfect the ‘art of killing infidels’ (Sic!) using every curve or crevice of human body- both male and female.

Not long ago we were introduced to Al Queda ‘Ass’assin brigade followed by ‘Penis Bomber’ now they are perfecting Bosom Bombers!!!!

Among all the above mentioned Great Islamic Bombers I am very concerned about ‘The Penis Bombers’! Why, you ask? Well what the fuck ‘Penis Bomber’ would do in Heaven -with all those 72 ‘eternal virgins’ and beautiful ‘kohl’ eyed hairless boys- with their ‘penises’ blown away!

Think Please. :)

Here is link to Kanchan Gupta’s post on the same subject, must read. Islam’s stockpile of human bombs.

Now I for one want to say only this…and the pic below say all.

PI

Breasts Not Bombs

Breasts Not Bombs

Read Full Post »

Truth as it is.

Truth as it is.

Mumbai is on boil again, or so I am made to believe by the breathless dumb Nymphets and pea brained Morons on 24X7 ‘Sec-Soc’ screaming channels.

This time Shiv Sena ‘hooligans’ have given them enough long stick to beat with. As if the ‘Sec-Soc’ MSM was not already against the Hindus right through, SS provided them more reasons. Let us see the two issues involved.

1. SS and MNS’s diatribes against Non Marathi Manoos.

2. SRK and his Paki love.

I have already expressed my views on the point No.1: SS and MMS’s diatribes against Non Marathi Manoos. In this post I had condemned Raj unequivocally and in this post I had argued why only Raj can’t be accused alone. I ask readers to read these two posts and you might be surprised to see the other side of truth too.

Now point no. 2: SRK and his Paki love. Here it is interesting to note the indignation of Indian ‘Sec-Soc’ MSM. On this point I am totally in agreement with Shiv Sena or with anybody else who think that we can not engage Pakis in any which way unless they stop killing my fellow countrymen/women/children.

Why alone SRK? He might be promoting his film ‘His Name Is Khan’ for all we know. But any body else too whose heart bleeds more for Pakis should be ostracized socially.

I have always been cynical of this Indo-Pak bonhomie. This ‘Pappi-Jhappi’ walas are freeloaders who at the tax payer’s expense enjoy, Kababs, Mujara, exchange gifts, attend Paki Mushayaras and do Wah! Wah! Strangely no Indian artist ever gets an invite from Paki’s to perform in Land Of Pure Islam: Pakistan. Traffic is only one way. Huh!

But then this ‘Pappi-Jhappi’ gang is very resourceful one, time and again they find ways to keep their supply of Kababs and Mujaras on. This time they have floated this under the banner of ‘Aman Ki Asha’.

‘Aman Ki Asha’! Wow! Look at the name it self ‘Aman’ a Urdu Male Name. Aasha a Hindi Female name and it is ‘Aman Ki Aasha’. So friends Love Jehad is on right from the word go. Now look at these two media houses who are promoting it.  The Times Slimes of India (the one who can smell money any where and every where) and their Paki co-sponsorer ‘Jung’ Daily. JUNG! Urdu word means: war. Lo Kar Lo Baat!

This piece here in Pioneer has identified these usual suspects- ‘Pappi-Jhappi’ Gang. I quote from it with my own inputs.

There are three groups in India which are obsessed with friendship with Pakistan. The first group comprises elderly people born in that part before partition (Kuldeep Nayyar, Khushwant Singh Inder Kumar Gujaral just to name some yes, Manmohan Singh too) and who are nostalgic about Lahore havelis, halwa and mujra. The second group comprises Bollywood actors, directors and assorted outfits who look at Pakistan as a big market (Shahrukh Khan, Mahesh Bhatt, Javed, Shabana and their ilk). Dawood Ibrahim’s gang has financed many of these useful idiots. The third group comprises bleeding heart liberals who hold candle light vigils and who cannot imagine India doing well without its ‘younger brother’ taken care of (almost all Sec-Soc MSM and their telesecularists). All three have been proved wrong a hundred times but they unfortunately play an important role in moulding opinion.

Just how true. The author further says.

If we want the world to treat Pakistan for what it is, then we should start practicing it. We must always recognise it as the ‘Terrorist State of Pakistan’ and never have any illusion that it is going to be any different. We should completely and comprehensively cut off all relations with Pakistan — economic, cultural, sports and all other aspects. Dawood Ibrahim-funded Bollywood may weep. South Africa was shamed and shunned for its policy of apartheid, so should Pakistan for practicing terrorism as a state policy. Unless we start completely boycotting the ‘Terrorist State of Pakistan’ we cannot ask others to do it. If we completely boycott the Pakistanis for a few years we will see the results. Their roots are Indic and not in Saudi Arabia.

Hope ‘Sec-Soc’ MSM listens to this sane advice.

If corporate India — including electronic and print media — starts practicing it, then we can see results in a few years. One hopes that India’s elite is listening and will not get carried away by asha for the demons.

Thanks God, India has still many Prudent Indians left who talk sense and keep the National Interest above all. Other wise our Prime Minister Minion of Sonia ‘Maino’ Gandhi would have no qualms in short changing the National Interest for few more ‘secular votes’, just as he shamelessly surrendered to Pakis not so long ago.

PI.

Read Full Post »

Hi Friends, I have been absent from this blog for some time now, not because there was any dearth of topics but largely to catch up with some serious reading. I suppose my self imposed sabbatical need to end now, so I am back with and among you all.

IPL, Pakistan and wailing Indian Media.

Welcome Sri Lankan Team, Pakistani Style.

Welcome Sri Lankan Team, Pakistani Style.

It may be understandable for Pakistanis to cry themselves hoarse over non selection (or sale) of their cricketers in IPL auction, but more than Pakis it is Indian MSM’s cacophony which is absurd. I disagree with those bleeding heart secularists and ‘Sec-Soc’ MSM as they argue 1.) Pakistani players should not have been invited. 2.) Sport and politics should not be mixed.

Both arguments are erroneous and unsustainable. 1.) Had Pakistan been informed that they were not welcome; even then they would not have behaved any differently than now, and rather would that not have been more embarrassing for India and would not have invited criticism internationally? On the contrary they were invited and put on for sale but nobody bought them. Simple! It is that simple. IPL and their franchises are free to choose any one they like and they just exercised their choice –for whatever reason- so what is the big deal?

Second as for ‘Sport and politics should not be mixed’, it is stupid to even think so. Sport after all is an extension of war albeit with out blood shed. Sports have always been part of international politics and diplomacy. Boycott of South Africa due to apartheid policy of theirs or boycotts of Olympics at various times by various countries prove that. Sports – had always been and shall always be a useful extension of foreign policy, subtle but powerful in impact.

Frankly, I believe there is no point in engaging a country that has been not only at war with us but has sworn to bleed India by thousands cuts. No way can the hatred of Pakistan towards India be mellowed, least alone by playing cricket with them. Pakistan’s and Indian MSM’s wailing is idiotic if not funny.

It is a fact that Pakistan is current 20:20 champion so is the fact that they are the only team to have murdered (indeed!) or have BOB Woolmer (their couch) murdered during last world cup. I do not believe what ever the investigation said; here read why I call this murder. Here is one more example for Paki’s love for cricket. Must see this.

Finally! If that was a ‘snub’ to them (Pakis), so be it. I congratulate IPL franchisees for showing courage and doing what our Lame Prime Minister Minion and his govt should have done much earlier, at least after 26/11.

I for one can not cheer up a Paki player as long as my fellow citizens are being blown to pieces every now and then by their (Pakis)  fellow countrymen.

PI.


PS: Here comes the Shahrukh as usual on the ‘Sec-Soc’ Undie TV and says, “he believes the Pakistani players should have been chosen…”. Pray for God (his case Allah) sake what stopped you?

Read Full Post »

Arun Jaitly is easily the most erudite speaker BJP has. Here is the speech he made at Rajya Sabha yesterday during a debate on the ‘Leaked’ first subsequently ‘reluctantly tabled’ in Parliament. Courtesy this site.

As for my response, shall blog soon after. Enjoy this speech mean while.

PI.

Shri Arun Jaitly On Liberhan Commission Report on Dec. 9/2009 in Rajya Sabha.

The Justice Liberhan Commission of Inquiry has now admittedly proved to be an exercise in futility. The title suit with regard to the disputed structure is pending before the Allahabad High Court. The criminal trials with regard to the purported incidents of 6th December, 1992 are pending before the Special Judge, Lucknow and Faizabad. The civil trial will decide the title issues and the criminal trial will address the culpability, if any. The Liberhan Commission was appointed by a Government in panic. This report, as is apparent from the Action Taken Report, is unimplementable. Several questions arise in the context of this report.

1) Why did it take 17 years for a Commission of Inquiry to formulate its recommendations and findings? Did the retired judge use the opportunity of heading this Commission to perpetuate his self-employment?
2) The manner and the leak of the report is as dubious as the report itself. The Home Minister says solemnly before the House that he or his Ministry did not leak the report. As the only other copies of the report are available either with the Judge or with de-facto drafts person of the report, the source of the leak has to be investigated.
3) Is the Report, as is apparent from the ATR, an unimplementable document? An analysis of the ATR reveals that except for lauding the political opinion expressed by the judge and agreeing with him, the other recommendations only relate to a proposal to legislate the Communal Violence (Prevention, Control and Rehabilitation of Victims) Bill, a subject over which the Central Government has no power to legislate or refer the matters to appropriate authorities like the UPSC, Election Commission and other statutory authorities.

Who has drafted the report ?

The report is hardly a document capable of being drafted by a retired High Court judge. The language is not judicial. The judge has unquestionably entered the political thicket. He has expressed an opinion on a variety of political subjects completely outside the Terms of Reference and outside the scope of a judicial training. The apprehension that the report is drafted by a person other than the judge himself is strengthened by the observation at page 999 where the judge thanks one Shri Harpreet Singh Giani and credits him in helping the judge in (a) analyzing the evidence (b) coming to conclusions (c) editing the report (d) adding and modifying the language (e) adding and modifying the ideas and (f) clearing the mess created by others.

Admittedly, it was Shri Giani who has analyzed the evidence, come to conclusions, edited the report, modified the language, added and modified the ideas. The judge seems only to have done the rest, if anything remained. The Liberhan – Giani report is the first Example of ‘Judgment Outsourcing’.

Does the report conclusively answer the key questions referred to the Commission ?

A Commission of Inquiry has to give a finding on basis of evidence. There has to be a link between the evidence produced and the conclusions reached. The learned judge admits in the report that there was no evidence of conspiracy or pre-planning lead by any party. (Refer page 15 para 7.4)

“No evidence was lead or information provided to the Commission with respect to the conspiracy or preplanning or the joint common enterprise, by any of these counsels”.

Page 775 para 130.5 –

“No documentary or direct evidence is possible in a conspiracy of this manner, nor unimpeachable and firm evidence of some action of planning of demolition available.”

Page 782 para 130.2

”Home Secretary, Godbole stated that there was no information of planning and as such it could not be inferred that there was a conspiracy of the Congress and BJP for demolition; this could not be accepted on the face of it particularly in the absence of any specific circumstances leading to such an inference.”

Page 992 para 178.34

“Neither the police nor the investigation team of the commission, despite the prolonged process, were able to identify any witness, nor produced any witness who could identify any of the demolishers, or lead any other evidence against suspects. Suspects were not even identified. Even after the unprecedented publicity throughout the long spell of inquiry nobody has come forward to advance the case or identify persons who physically carried out the demolition or the ones who plotted its demolition.”

Page 724 para 121.7

“In totality, it becomes obvious that some leaders were consciously kept out of the operational area or planning in order to protect them and preserve their secular credentials for later political use”.

After coming to this conclusion the judge fails to identify the leaders who were unaware of the design of the so-called planners. And still the judge goes on to blame the entire leadership of BJP and RSS for being aware and privy to the conspiracy.

At page 994 para 178.37 the Commission observes that “Important leaders of political parties, icons of movements, organizers of the movement continuously issued statements from time to time in relation to the conspiracy of demolition but no affidavit was filed before the Commission by them.”

In the White Paper published by the Govt. of India in 1993, which was placed before the Commission there was not even an averment of pre-planning or conspiracy involving senior leaders or organizations.

It is a settled law that the level of proof a Commission of Inquiry has to accept in fixing culpability has to be beyond reasonable doubt. In a case of no evidence, the Commission has come to the conclusion that the demolition was pre-planned and has named a large number of people, including those who were in no way connected with the incident of 6th December, 1992.

I am constrained to say that this Commission is a text book illustration of what a Commission should not be. A Junior judge of the Punjab & Haryana High Court is picked up to head the Commission. The only credentials of the judge at the time of his appointment was his proximity to the then Law Minister. It has frequently been said that there are two categories of judges – “those who know the law and those who know the Law Minister” This judge fell in the latter category. His knowledge of the Queen’s language was somewhat limited. He therefore needed the ghost writer to analyse the evidence, come to conclusions, modify the language and ideas. He used the 17 years tenure of the Commission to perpetuate an employment for himself. He probably wanted to use the conclusions and findings as an application for future employment. The report of the Commission would itself demonstrate that this truth investigator had turned into a political pundit.

Does this Report go beyond its terms and errs on basic facts?

The Liberhan Commission is a compilation of howlers and mistakes as is evident from the following :

1) Page 282 of the Report gives a compilation of 8 names of leaders of Ayodhya movement whom no role could be attributed to except participating in negotiations. The list includes two alleged supporters of the movement who are well known historians viz. Prof. R.S. Sharma and Prof. D. N. Jha. Both are Left leaning historians who presented the case of Babri Masjid Action Committee in the dialogue. The list of those who participated in the movement (P 270) includes Additional DGP Intelligence, Col. B.S. Zaidi (BMAC representative) Devraha Baba, Jagdambika Pal etc. Read the absurd list of Muslim Leaders on Page 279. This will only prove that the report suffers from factual hallucinations. The Commission also gets the date of Gandhiji’s assassination wrong (page 69). He even regards Veer Savarkar as the founder of the RSS and Dr. Hedgewar as his successor (page 562)

2) On page 566 the Commission in para 85.14 goes beyond the scope of inquiry and accuses – “Shri Din Dayal Upadhyay impliedly and by his conduct agreed with MA Jinnah’s theory that Hindus and Muslims were two separate nations”. He then quotes from Deen Dayal Upadhyay to the effect that “Muslims are not a minority community; they are a nation. They must have their independent land and their own State.” He therefore compares the BJP philosophy to that of Mr. Jinnah. This subject matter was privately obtained by the Commission. The fundamental mistake he made was that the entire paragraph was never said by Shri Deen Dayal Upadhyay. This is a quote from M.A. Jinnah which he puts in the mouth of Deen Dayal Upadhyay and then compares his philosophy with that of Jinnah. This is precisely what happens to a judge with no understanding of politics who tries to don the role of a political pundit.

3) The judge has a strong bias on certain issues. On page 556 he indicts political leadership for greed. “for their individual aggrandizement through repression, misguidance, acquiring power through mass means and improper reliance on philosophies such as Hindutva, Mandal, son of soil etc.”

4) The bias of the judge is further apparent in his recommendations where on page 970 para 173.8 and 173.9 he calls for a review of the recruitment procedure of the bureaucracy. He wants only excellence in certain areas to be a criteria for recruitment. He wants the postings to be done only on merit and not on casteist or regional basis. Who authorized this judge to carry on a tirade against social justice and Mandal Commission which has been unanimously accepted in this country? The Government has done a dis-service to this nation by mentioning in its ATR that the UPSC is examining changes in the recruitment process of officers and this recommendation was also communicated to the UPSC.

5) The Commission uses the report to indict the entire leadership of this country. –

Pg 540 paras 79.3, 79.4 and para 79.5

“The loss of political neutrality and the convenience with which justification can be found for every action has rendered all objectives of peaceful civilized society as enunciated by intellectuals, leaders, philosophers, thinkers since ancient times, obliterated…..

The law – common or constitutional, morals, ethics, epics and everything else is being examined in the scales of politically desirable results. It is immaterial whether those results are legitimate or healthy for democratic governance. Every one is out to become politician rather than a statesman.

The politician has become the epitome of the proverbial rags-to-riches story.

The common Indian has formed the firm belief already that the ills that face us can be traced to the political leadership and can be cured by a voluntary reform in the political parties and their leadership itself.”

On Gulzari Lal Nanda and Devraha Baba

The judge chooses to condemn whoever he desires to and that too without evidence. There is no mention of the former Prime Minister, Shri Gulzari Lal Nanda in evidence. Yet the judge choses to refer to him by saying –“Prof. Rajinder Singh, RSS leader, Dau Dayal Khanna, Gulzari Lal Nanda, the die-hard Hindus, in connivance with people with similar thoughts, started conceiving and exploiting the local dispute at a national level, may be for their selfish political needs or for achieving their old theory of Hindu Rashtra.” (Page 336) The Commission has no concern for truth. He is willing to go by giving irresponsible statements. On page 427 para 69.22 he says “open threats by exhorting the dacoits to take to arms for Ram temple were made by Ashok Singhal, Devrah Baba, Harish bhai etc.” The Judge fixes responsibility on Devrah baba for leading the country to communal discord on page 958and 959. This is notwithstanding the fact that Devrah Baba, a highly revered person had died in the year 1990, much prior to the alleged incident.

The report makes an interesting fairy tale. The Commission indicts the District Judge of Faizbad for directing the opening of the locks of the disputed site in 1986 (page 87). The Commission is convinced that the judge was inspired by a monkey to pass the judicial order since the monkey always accompanied Mr. Pandey, the District Judge of Faizabad.

The Evidence against Mr. L.K. Advani

The key question was that whether Mr. L.K. Advani and other senior BJP leaders made repeated requests to a small section of Kar Sewaks who had climbed up to the disputed structures, not to demolish it and come down. The Commission considers these appeals made by Shri L.K. Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, Ashok Singhal, Vijay Raje Scindia HV Sheshadari etc. (page 255) as having been made either in earnest or for media’s benefit. The Commission contrives a curious logic that an appeal was made to the kar sewaks to come down from the domes but no appeal was made not to enter the Garb Grih. Therefore the hidden intention was to demolish the structure. The judge conveniently forgets the evidence given to the CBI in relation to the charge sheet by a lady IPS officer deputed as Mr. L.K. Advani’s PSO that he requested Uma Bharati to go to the structure to persuade the kar sewaks to come down. In fact Shri Advani insisted on going himself but could not go because the security officers including the PSO refused to take him there in order to avoid a possible conflict with the kar sewaks who had climbed on to the dome. Voluminous evidence of witnesses who have testified to the same effect of the appeals of senior leaders has been completely ignored by the Commission. While ignoring this evidence of the Lady Officer on page 507 with regard to another questions he says – “There is no reason to disbelieve her on these facts since as the security officer attached to LK Advani she had unrestricted access to all the happenings…..”

Did the Commission have a bias against the temple being built at the Ram Janamasthan ?

The Commission at page 23 of the report accepts Ayodhya as the birth place of the Hindu god Ram and therefore a holy city. He accepts at page 63 that – “yet namaz was not offered at the disputed structure since 1934”. He does not contest the finding of 1885 by a British judge FEA Chalmers in a civil appeal “It is most unfortunate that a masjid should have been built on a land sacredly held by hindus and as that occurred 356 years ago it is too late to remedy the grievance. (Page 97) “The judge accepts on page 561 that “the history books produced before Commission as well as the White Paper issued by the Govt.of India and BJP and also contentions by various counsels are unanimous that in 1528, the Emperor Babar ordered Mir Baqi, his Commander to erect a mosque at Ayodhya.” And yet his bias is apparent at page 547 where he says – “The demand for construction of the temple deprived the Hindu religion of its secular, multi-religious and multicultural credentials of the well reputed Hindu philosophy and the thoughts generally prevalent.” The judge ostensibly makes this entire narration of circumstances as leading up to 6th December, 1992. If admittedly Ayodhya is perceived to be the birth place of Lord Ram, if Mir Baqi converted the temple into a mosque, if for over 500 years a struggle for a temple was on, how could the demand for restoration of temple be anti- secular and the demand for maintaining forcible occupation of a mosque be secular. It is precisely this perversion in the concept of secularism that the Ayodhya movement was aimed at exposing. The truth investigator turned political pundit suffered from the same perversion.

Malafide error relating to Shri Atal Behari Vajpayee

The Commission was more loyal than the king. The Commission has committed a fundamental error in relation to its finding with regard to Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee. Little did the Commission realize that Shri Vajpayee is a tall national leader of proven credibility. The Commission of Inquiry Act in section 8B clearly mentions that if the Commission is of the opinion that the conduct of a person is required to be inquired into or that his reputation is likely to be affected, the Commission shall give to that person a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

The Commission on page 958 gives a list of persons including Shri Vajpayee and Shri Devrah Baba who are culpable for creating communal discord. There are at least 30 people out of 68 to whom admittedly no notice was given under section 8B. While the Commission on page 942 states that leaders like LK Advani, Shri A.B. Vajpayee and Shri Murli Manohar Joshi would have known the designs of the Sangh parivar, they are pseudo moderates. Obviously in trying to indict Mr. Vajpayee the Commission went for an overkill little realizing that Mr. Vajpayee had a high credibility. In that process the Commission shot itself in the foot and hurt its own credibility. Was it any part of the Commission’s job to find a political response to the BJP’s use of Phrase ‘pseudo Secular’? It is not only in Shri Vajpayee’s case, the commission has chosen to indict several leaders including many of the Muslim community without issuing a Section 8B notice to them. The report in so far as it hurts reputation of people without a Section 8B Notice is non-est.

On the Role of Central Govt.

The Commission was obviously kind to its appointing authority. The burden of its argument is that since the central government did not receive a report from the Governor whose judgement was badly flawed, the Central government was helpless in the matter of invoking Article 356. The Commission did not issue a notice to the Governor. It indicts the Governor but without a notice under section 8B. Shri PV Narasimha Rao authored a book titled ‘Ayodhya 6th December, 1992.’ The book has been published after his demise. At page 170 of the book, Shri Narasimha Rao reproduced the letter/report of the Governor wherein he categorically stated that ‘the possibility of demolition of the structure could not be ruled out.’ Obviously, the Commission wanted to be more charitable to his appointing authority, Shri Narasimha Rao. He even concealed the existence of a report. Even otherwise the argument of the Commission that the existence of a report was a condition precedent for invoking Article 356 by the Central Government is specious. The Commission completely ignored the words “or otherwise” in Article 356.

Strictures against Constitutional authorities

The Judge presiding over Commission is a bitter man. He was extremely keen to be elevated to the Supreme Court. Despite his keenness, members of the Supreme Court collegium did not consider it appropriate to recommend his name. This was his last opportunity to get back at the Supreme Court. He departs from the principle of inter institutional courtesy and indicts the Governor of UP, High Court of UP, an observer of Supreme Court and even the Supreme Court itself. At page 935 the Commission opines –

“For instance, the intransigent stance of the High Court of Uttar Pradesh, the obdurate attitude of the Governor, the inexplicable irresponsibility of the Supreme Court’s observer and the short-sightedness of the Supreme Court itself are fascinating and complex stories, the depths of which I must not plumb.”

The Commission is unaware of the basic courtesies and constitutional restraints imposed upon senior constitutional functionaries. The Commission ignores the requirement of section 8B and decides to indict superior constitutional authorities even without a notice.

Who were present on 6th December, 1992 ?

The Commission records the presence of every person in Ayodhya on 6.12.1992 (page 743). Prominent amongst those the Commission names who were admittedly not present. Balasaheb Thakre who was in Mumbai, Kalyan Singh, Chief Minister, UP who was in Lucnow, Rajinder Gupta, Uma Nath Singh,Lalji Tandon, Brahm Dutt Dwivedi ministers in UP Govt. who were in Lucknow, Kusha bhau Thakre, S.S. Bhandari, Sikander Bakht who were in Delhi and Shri Prabhat Kumar Chief Secretary UP who was in Lucknow. Where did the Commission get all this erroneous facts from. The Commission never bagged this factual narration and conclusions on any evidence but got it from some extraneous source.

How the Commission and the Government procured evidence ?

There is a Central government witness – a journalist named Raman Kirpal. He had purportedly deposed before the Commission and the Commission has relied on his affidavit and evidence. In 29 November, 2009 issue of the weekly magazine ‘OPEN’ Raman Kirpal has written an article titled “My Crippled Testimony”. Shri KIrpal’s article amongst others states “ The CBI officials gave me a date for deposition in New Delhi. I reached there right on time. They showed me an affidavit and asked me to sign……… During the cross examination I was asked to reply in “Yes’ or ‘no’. The format was so tight you could not explain anything. For instance, I was asked whether BJP ‘s LK Advani gave any speech at the dias asking the Kar Sewaks to demolish. I said ‘no’ but………. The lawyer interrogating me immediately shut me up… just reply in ‘yes’ or ‘no’ he said………… The tight format of the cross examination and my status as CGW 24 undermined several things which should have put the Central government of PV Narasimha Rao in a spot….. What surprises me that the Commission rescues the Central Government in its conclusions it says “The Central Government was crippled by the failure of intelligence agencies to provide an analysis of the situation. …..

This is my truth as a reporter. My affidavit as CGW 24 still stands but it is a crippled truth. There was much more that I could have wanted to say……..”. Did this Commission function as a Kangaroo court?

Recommendations of the Commission on subjects beyond its jurisdiction.

(a) The Commission has recommended (page 966) that “the next logical conclusion must therefore be that the government which is formed on the premise of religion or has religion on its agenda can be barred.” This is not constitutionally permissible. This is a new jurisprudence espoused by the Commission. How can a government be barred?

(b) The Commission has recommended that there must be a body constituted to look into the working of the Constitution. Perhaps the Commission was blissfully unaware of the fact that the Committee headed by Justice Venkatchaliah has already given a detailed report to the Government. The Commission at page 970 recommends a review of the Recruitment policy of the government into the civil service. He wants merit alone to be the criteria and not a caste or regional basis. Read in the context of the Commission’s earlier recommendation on Mandal Commission it is clear that the Commission suffers from caste bias. The Commission has recommended (page 971) that civil servants should be barred from holding office of profit after retirement. It is indeed a paradoxical recommendation from a judge who retired long ago and has enjoyed 48 extensions recommends no retired civil servant should be given any post retirement assignment. The Commission has gone into the question of Centre State relations (page 976) AND RECOMMENDED THAT NO State government can claim that it acts only for the persons or people within the boundary of the State and discriminate against others. While not disagreeing with the Commission on this, the question was not within the jurisdiction of the Commission. Was he dealing with Ayodhya incident or going into larger issue – the question of Centre State relation. Similarly the Commission recommends (page 976) party affiliations must come to an end the moment a legislator is elected. The Commission now wants the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution prohibiting defections to be repealed. Was this within the terms of reference of the Commission?

(c) The Commission obviously dislikes the media. (page 980 ). The Commission recommends that there must be a permanent authority to hear complaints against “mischievous journalists”. He wants a licensing regime back not in the industry but for joining the profession of journalism.

(d) The Commission at page 979 states as under:-

“It is therefore my recommendation that a statutory national commission be composed of acknowledged experts to delve into the questions of the provenance of historical monuments, artifacts etc. and their determination should be deemed to be definitive and final.”

The word provenance means — “the history of the ownership of the object specially when demanded or authenticated”. The Oxford dictionary of difficult words defines provenance as a place of origin or the earliest known history of something. Let this test recommended by Justice Liberhan be applied to the disputed structure at Ayodhya where already a report of the ASI exists indicating the existence of a temple before 1528. The Government in its ATR has rightly said in para 6.6 that a special Commission is not required for the said purpose as the ASI is already undertaking this mandate. The Allahabad High Court had asked the ASI to examine the site and the recovered stones from the erstwhile structure and submit to the High Court its expert opinion. The ASI in the year 2003 submitted its report to the Allahabad High Court where it concludes on basis of entire evidence. “Now viewing in totality and taking into account the archaeological evidence of a massive structure just below he disputed structure and evidence of continuity in structural phases from the tenth century onwards upto the construction of the disputed structure along with the yield of stone and decorated bricks as well as mutilated sculpture of divine couple and carved architectural members including foliage patterns, amalaka, kapotapali doorjamb with semi-circular pilaster, broken octagonal shaft of black schist pillar, lotus moif, circular shrine having pranala (waterchute) in the north fifty pillar bases in association of the huge structure, are indicative of remains which are distinctive features found associated with the temples of north India.”

This report was preceded by a Ground penetrating Radar Survey (GPRS) which also came to same conclusions.
Did a temple exist at the site prior to 1528 ?

The Commission has categorically given an opinion that Ayodhya is perceived as the birth place of Lord Rama and that Mir Baqi constructed a mosque at the disputed site in 1528. The crucial question is what is the historical character of the site in question. Admittedly, the site has great religious and cultural significance to our civilization and nation. Overwhelming evidence exists about the existence of a temple at the birth place of Lord Rama at Ayodhya. This evidence is in the form of archaeological evidence, GPRS evidence and accounts of various travelers who contemporaneously wrote their accounts.

………. The universally revered Sikh Guru, Guru Nanak Dev visited Ayodhya along with his associate ‘Mardana’. Contemporaneous Sikh literature finds a reference to the Guru’s communication to Mardana. Bhai Bala wali janam Sakhi also has a detailed reference to this visit. The visit took place between 1508 and 1510. The eighth successor of Guru Nanak Dev’s eldest son Lakhmi Chand Ji Baba Sukhi Ram Bedi in his works has referred to Guru Nanak Dev’s darshan of Ram Janamasthan.

The historical sketch of the Faizabad in Zila Faizabad refers to the existence of the Janamasthan at Ayodhya. It categorically records that at the janamasthan Emperor Babar built a mosque in 1528.

The Earlier Travels in India written by William Foster refers to Ayodhya where the ruins of Ram Chander acknowledged as an Indian God were found.

The Gazetteer of Awadh refers to the Janamasthan as the place where Ram Chander was born.

The Geography of Hindustan written by Father Jose Tieffn-Thacer Is still available in French. A copy of it was obtained from France and got translated into English under directions of the Court. The said travel refers to Ayodhya where a temple had been constructed on elevated bank of the river. It then refers to a debate as to whether it was demolished and converted into a mosque by Aurangzeb and then corrected to say that others believed that it was actually constructed by Babar.

There have been several struggles in the past 500 years for the restoration of the Janamasthan. The existence of a mosque built after desecration of the temple has never been accepted by the Hindus. The past 500 years have witnessed repeated struggles for rights of the Hindus at the Janamasthan.

In the later part of the 19th century the Nihangs had occupied the structure for a reasonable long period on the premise that Guru Nanak Dev had performed his worship at the site. In 1934 the Hindus were fined by the British Government for some damage caused to the structure during an agitation. There are judicial orders dating back to 1885 in relation to the legal and judicial dispute.

The principal question is – What was the original character of this structure? Unquestionably, the original character was a temple. It was no ordinary temple. It was a temple built at the place believed to be the Janamasthan of Lord Ram. No religious denomination can ever accept a conquest of such a sacred place. The historical, archaeological and GPRS evidence is entirely against the historical vandalism of 1528. The next 500 years have seen agitation for recapturing and litigation over the issue. Since 1934 no namaz has been performed and puja goes on regularly.

The ability of Indian society at dispute settlement is at stake. The judicial institutions have been unable to decide the issue for decades. The ideal dispute resolution is through negotiations.

A fair secular society requires equality of all. A secular order is not irreligious. It is not anti-religion. It is respect for all religions. Protection of legitimate rights of the minorities is unquestionably a test of a secular society. At the same time the majority cannot live for centuries with a feeling of reverse discrimination. The history of the past 500 years has shown that the majority has been denied its right to build a historical temple at its most revered place. The Home Minister has framed the wrong question that it is a choice between inclusiveness and divisiveness. Does your inclusiveness exclude the religious aspiration of the majority for the sake of vote bank politics. We reject your ‘Vote bank inclusiveness’ as we reject the LIberhan report. We stand for “Justice for all, with neither discrimination nor reverse discrimination”.

Read Full Post »

Mumbai Vigil: Is Lighting Candles alone we wish away terrorism?

Mumbai Vigil: By Lighting Candles alone we want to wish away terrorism?

Kind Attention:

Extremely Respected Ma Balidaan Moorti Reverend Sonia ‘Maino’ Ji Gandhi.

Preamble: This is an earnest appeal to bring Back Shiv Raj ‘Zombie’ Patil as first anniversary of 26/11 approaches. I submit my case for ‘Zombie’s’ Political Rehabilitation, please consider.

As the first anniversary of Mumbai Mayhem is approaching, so has the Padamshris of MSM packed their bags and have camped in Mumbai. This Padamshri ‘tweeted’ “off to mumbai with half- a voice, for we the people! hoping to see some of you at the show, and others later on twitter. have a great day.”

Well who could have any objection (except Raj) for anyone to go anywhere in India, leave alone Indians any Rana, Hadlee, Bhatt can go anywhere; do whatever… for, we are ‘Socialist, Secular, Liberal, Progressive Society’ constantly under watch by our ever so efficient 24X7 ‘Sec-Soc’ MSM. So if our Padamshris and not yet decorated Media Gurus go and camp at Ground Zero, no one should have any grudge – especially I do not have any.

For I understand first anniversary of 26/11 Mumbai Mayhem is ‘VERY BIG MEDIA EVENT’ and like any other Professional Company MSM too has the right to milk the EVENT to it’s fullest.

However, I can foretell what we are going to serve with…

One Padamshri will hold ‘her’ Darbaar at Gate way of India with same set of people (who we saw last time lighting candles) appearing, saying same things they said last time.

Same Home Minister (Patil who was sacked then’ is back now) will mumble same inanities he mumbled last time.

Same lesson how the ‘Resilience’ of Mumbai is legendry and blah blah…

Same channels, same stories, same gory music in background, same footage of same events along with the same commentary of same anchors. Phew!!!!!!!!!

Same crocodile tears, same sermons about communal harmony, same theories about foreign hands – Now this is especially important for them to emphasize as a Son of a Motor Mouth Secularist too figures in investigation making it imperative for MSM to delink him of any wrong doing, if only to salvage the ‘secularists’ bruised ‘exaggerated ego’ in public eyes.

Equally sure  same time I am that the famous whipping boy of MSM, Narrender Bhai Modi would find more than ample scorn thrown at him for “Gujarat Holocaust”, HOLOUCAST!!!! Right Mr. PM? As we are to believe that terrorism of secular variety started from then on!

Some New Ideas for the First Anniversary of Mumbai Mayhem are however being implemented too.

Saw AB Jr. exhorting people to call each other for one hour (8.36 Pm to 9.36 Pm on 26/11/2009) that day as he ensures us that revenue earned will be given to victims. BUT then this IDEA is of a famous cellular company and they might be right (Sic!) in exploring public sentiments- if not to earn profit, for some publicity at least. These days- in any way- MSM ad slots are high and this stunt is far cheaper.

(One thing, lest I forgot, did you notice that how much RS. Are added to your phone bill when you send an SMS to News Channels? I DID AND THAT IS BIG FAT RS. FIVE. Got It? Where the normal SMS charge is 1.50 Rs. Alone! So who is making a kill?  Wonder why every TV Anchor asks you to SMS them Y/N for each stupid question? Scandalous! Need to be investigated.)

Now my point is: nothing has changed since then and nothing will ever. So why punish ‘Zombie’ Patil alone?

Last time faithful MSM had spread the public anger against the inefficient Congress Govt both at State and Center over the entire Political Class thus diluting the anger against Congress Govts. And that was a very cleaver and smart move by MSM- led by PadamShris (whom you (Sonia) blessed) from front. Move paid and MSM’s Favorite party is back in power again- so nothing has changed. Not even the public.

Now even if for a change we will see Same State Home Minister (who was sacked for his failure by your good self) paying tributes to those brave hearts!  Then what has the poor ‘Zombie’ Patil done? Therefore my humble submission is to Please bring back Shiv Raj ‘Zombie’ Patil – if not as Union Minister of Home then as Governor of Maharashtra at least.

As this is a farce alone, so why not complete it by including Shiv ‘Zombie’ Patil?

Why should only poor ‘Zombie Patil’  be deprived of the ‘Gala Media Event’? Is it fair?

Hail Democracy! Hail MSM! Hail One Billion Indians!

As for this ‘audacious’ PI. I…

Will not light candles.

Will not watch Media circus

Will not read paper’s detailed accounts.

In short I will not be part of this ‘farce’. PERIOD

I simply pay my tributes to those who fell in the line of duty and have become mere statistics. AND for those too who will soon fell and become statistics since nothing has changed nor it seems; will ever.

PI.

PS: Excuse me for my cynicism, but it is how it is.

Read Full Post »

Tweety BatMan

Tweety BatMan

Finally, I decided to download TweetDeck after almost 8 months of opening this tweet account. I was hesitant because I felt 140 words might not be sufficient to express one’s opinion. Well I was wrong.

For two three days I observed people (especially my fellow bloggers friends) and was amazed how this medium has brought the community more closer than ever. Tweets reach to large nos of people is amazing, so is the speed with which you communicate.  Sharing links, picking up clues, in real time could not have been better. Some of Tweets were complete post in itself ‘Micro Blogging’? Well Yes Indeed. I too did tweet  :)  and enjoyed and believe me contrary to my apprehensions (what ever I had ) the response has not only been encouraging but simply great.

Thanks to you all.

Now if this ‘Tweeting’ becomes another cause of Barkha Dutt Didi’s concern -considering she has already and always been furious with bloggers – now this Tweet too? So be it. I must admit that the most of tweets I happened to read reflected some ‘undisputed and uncontested’ love for Barkha Didi and Rajdeep Bahiya such as these ‘PadamShris’ really deserve.  :)

Wonder some tweeter too might attract Barkha Dutt Didi’s special attention as the ‘Hapless’ Kunte invited – I most certainly do not want to be The One.

Anyway I do not see what the purpose of writing this post is!  :)

Well simply this: I am Tweeting and I am Here and most Importantly, I am enjoying it.

C u soon …. Happy Tweeting.

PI.

 

PS: BTW was Tweet available last year Nov 2008, Mumbai attack time? Will Some one please enlightens me.

Read Full Post »

National Interst? What? Sonia's Interest is what matters: MMS

National Interst? What? Sonia's Interest is what matters: MMS

The credentials of Shri G Parthasarthi are beyond reproach, especially in matters related to ‘foreign affairs’ he is an authority. G Parthasarthi is apolitical, unbiased and most importantly does not carry any ideological baggage and neither does he have an axe to grind unlike the Sec-Soc media and ‘Sonia stooges’ in MSM. I always look up to Shri Parthasarthi for a clear perspective on matters related to ‘foreign policy’, especially when it is related with Pakistan.

The abject surrender by the MMS and his team of worthies at Sharm – el- Sheikh is what Parthasarthi calls as ‘Sharm -less-  Surrender’ and this sums it all up and very aptly. No need to say anything more here, I leave that to the ‘foreign affairs experts’ to enlighten us.

Since after this ‘Shame Less Surrender’ MMS is back and has been facing flak – rightly so- from all quarters. There is an outrage and people are angry about the sell out and that ‘too’ to Pakistan. The new entrant to the Sonia family owned ‘secular party’, MOS foreign affairs Shashi Tharoor dismisses it as just…

“It’s all very well for the people to say that somehow India’s interest was compromised by a few words on a piece of paper that is not a legal document,” said Tharoor.

As if this was not enough…

“It (the joint statement) is a diplomatic paper that is released to the press different from legal papers,” he maintains.

Tell me again that this man ran for UNO Secretary General’s post!

Coming back to the ‘Shame Less Surrender’ to Pakistan and the subsequent reaction in India, I wonder what all this annoyance is about! Is it the first time that the prime minister (and all Congress men/women) has sold out India’s advantage to Pakistan in hope of consolidating and harvesting ‘secular votes’ during elections!

Foreign policy for any country is a serious issue and is taken with utmost sincerity. Only the ‘National Interest’ of their country is supreme most and all the countries in the world including Pakistan recognizes it, but Alas! We Indians are an exception. We are the ONLY country in the World (and mind you BILLION + STRONG) who prides in self for capitulating and shortchanging our ‘strategic, military and even diplomatic’ advantages over Pakistan for petty gains. And ‘petty gains’ for whom? For ‘we the people of India’? NAY- but for the petty gains of one Family and for their stooges alone.

This is not an accusation hurled at Sonia or at her Prime Minion in anger or in a fit of rage. No. PM after PM from the Congress stable has blundered with such sickening frequency. The Congress has perfected and copyrighted it in the hope of garnering ‘secular votes’. Congress’s unstated policy /belief is that Pakistan must be placated anyhow if Congress is to appear secular in the eyes of the Indian Muslims. This is an affront to Indian Muslims too, if only they (Muslims) understand it. My charge is that the Congress has failed India time and again and at the cost of India’s National Interest.

This is just to refresh your memory of certain misdeeds committed (at our and our beloved nation’s expense) by the Prime Ministers from the ‘secular party’.

Starting from beginning (the root cause of all problems) Pandit J L Nehru (Chachaji) could just not suppress his urge and compromised on the Indian claim to Kashmir. He went on radio to announce and then on to UNO, despite the sane advice of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel against doing so. But then Chacha Ji had the propensity of using, in my dear friend Sandeep’s words,

“How a man whom a lot of liberals consider the “architect of modern India” allowed the wrong part of his anatomy to interfere in strategic decision-making.”

Do Read and weep.

Chachaji did not stop here only, he went on and ‘traded off’ India’s historic and cultural influence over Tibet with the then Chinese PM for some hollow promise and see how China swallowed Tibet! Chachaji had big illusions of being a ‘World Leader’ so some shortchange of ‘National Interest’ in pursuance of that goal was ok with him.

Now I hold Shri Lal Bahadur Shastriji in high esteem, but even he too lost the strategic and military advantage over Pakistan in Tashkent, a deal brokered by the communist USSR. This was followed by the death of Shastri Ji @ Tashkent under not so clear circumstances.

Indira Gandhi – way back in 1971, whom Atal Ji then hailed as ‘Durga’ – is remembered and known ‘more’ for splitting Pakistan into two. As a matter of record Sam Manek Shaw drafted that victory and capturing 90,000 Pakistani soldiers alive was his ‘achievement’ and that too was squandered away by Indira ‘Durga’ Gandhi after the ‘infamous’ walk on Mall Road of Simla with wily Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.

What did India gain except some hollow promises from Bhutto in exchange of these POWs (Prisioners of War)?

Not for nothing my Grandfather who served Indian Army then in these two wars, derided  Congress Netas as ‘Gandhi Topis’  for squandering the military gains (at the cost of Soldiers lives)  across the negotiating table to Pakistan for known only to them ‘gains’.

Prince is no different either.

What explains then the release of 90,000 (NINTY THOUSAND PAKISTANI SOLDIERS AS POW) could they not have been used as a bargaining tool to settle all and any disputes with Pakistan for once and all and ON OUR OWN CONDITIONS? What then made Indira to let go free these 90,000 Pakistani soldiers? And now their ‘progeny’ make such a hue and cry of releasing four Pakistanis in exchange of 200 lives brushing aside the exchange of FIVE terrorists for Saeed’s daughter Rubihya!!!!

But No, both father (Chachaji) and daughter did nothing in the larger interest of Nation but for their petty gains. Both were seriously myopic and self centered .As for poor Shastri Ji, he died in mysterious circumstances and I have nothing against him.

Had things stopped here would have still been of some commiseration. But no, we are doomed to be misgoverned by Congress. PV Narsimha Rao though considered as the best PM among the Congress stable, aborted Nuclear Tests presumably under US pressure. It was for ABV to defy even the omniscient and omnipresent US Satellites to conduct that when he became Prime Minister.

If Chachaji and the original Mrs. Gandhi – born Indian at least - played havoc with Indian National Interest, could then a Prime Minion under a ‘Reluctant Indian’ of ‘Italian origin’ do better? So why the hell this outrage!!!!!!!

After all 15% of India’s  ‘secular’ population is to be kept in good humor for them to vote ‘en block’ during elections for the ‘secular party’  and voting ‘strategically’ against the ‘communal party’ – equating them (Indian Muslims)  with Pakistanis is not an insult to them, but Secularism! And this ‘Secularism’ propounded by Chachaji and followed by other Congress men/women/Babes and Babes is the key to power.

MMS is toeing the same line as his predecessors did; and his ‘ Big Fart’ at Sharm – el – Sheikh is nothing unusual, just in line of compromising Indian National Interest at the altar of a ‘few secular votes’.

Shameless are they?

No, they were in power and have ‘managed/manufactured’ another win too.

Now it is to us ‘The Billion strong nation’ to be shame faced and feel betrayed by yet another Congress Pm @ our cost. As for Sonia’s Prime Minion: he sure has ensured his ‘pension’ and ensuing perks.

PI.

Read Full Post »

100% Optical Illusion Alone Lol! I am back after a prolonged hiatus from blog and this is my first post since the Sonia/ MMS ‘mysteriously’ managed electoral survival. Well, not only that – but managed to come back with more nos of seats than last time too. Sure, MMS by virtue of being a career bureaucrat all his life; knows the ‘art of survival’.

Well, where the credit to Madame Sonia ‘Maino’ Gandhi and Crowned Prince is understandable nevertheless the role of Media especially of the Liberal – Secular variety can not be underestimated either. May be that is precisely why the News Queen and News Raja were suitably awarded by the Sonia’s Prime Minion!!!

Placement of ‘Right’ man/woman in ‘right’ place at ‘right’ time for ‘right’ job did not disappoint Sonia and her team at all.

If in case this person had failed to deliver the desired results; the powers to be had one back up plan ready to meet that contingency. i.e.: in case of hung verdict the other ‘right’ person at ‘right’ place for the ‘right’ decision would have come in to play.

Congress has ruin ruled India for long and has perfected the art of managing ‘constitutional posts’ very well. History proves my point.

Look at the post ‘results 2009’ political scene. Methodically; difficult allies like Left are decimated. Blackmailing allies like Laloo and Paswan are biting dust. Stream of corrupt politicians (Balu, Raja etc) from MDMK- though are back, but chastened somewhat. Missionary minister like Ramdoss of PMK ‘blew away’.  Potential threats from Maya, Jaya, Naidu etc. is checked and mated well. Political dalals (as we saw in action July last year during No Confidence motion) are jobless. And for sure the ‘Communal BJP’ is routed.

Congress never had it so good in recent times. WOW!

All this with single digit increase in % share of votes!

Single digit % increase in votes resulting in almost 100 seats gain!

UNBELIEVABLE you say!

For no other reason, I call this ‘the perfect election planning’. Kudos to Sonia ‘Maino’ Gandhi!

Spin-misters of Congress dynasty masquerading as ‘journalists’ and/or outright Congress stooges deeply embedded in Sec-Soc ‘main stream media’ are smug and gloating over ‘the mysterious’ win of Congress. In their collective wisdom the victory of Congress is attributed to the ‘Tayag’ of Sonia, to smiling dimpled face of Crowned Prince and yes to Dr. ‘the economist’ PM too is mentioned in some passing reference. How every one including this ‘Great’ did not see the PRO Congress Wave before results 2009? No body answers.

Mata Ji Tusi Great Ho! Sachi Muchi!

Jaikara Maata 10 Janpath Walli Da…

Bol Sonia Tere Darbaar Ki Jai.

MMS in his earlier avatar as PM was a big disappointment, had very little to boost of, for positives (if any) the credit was appropriated by Maa Balidaan Moorti and the Crowned Prince and for majority of all things MMS govt failed miserably, blame was passed conveniently on to the difficult allies like Left or to blackmailer like Laloos or to corrupt Balu and Raja or to opportunistic Ram Vilas etc. MMS as Prime Minion Minister either knew nothing or did nothing. Even it took him FULL FOUR years to fire this ‘Zombie’!

If at all one and only achievement credited to MMS was: The Nuclear ‘NoClear’ deal! Right from beginning it was mired in one controversy followed by another and finally was finalized at the cost of ‘democracy’ with active support of ‘Power brokers’ and conniving Media ‘stalwarts’. Worst fears expressed against the deal then; have come to fore now.

Having said above, I wish us Billion + Indians good luck (we need it and loads of it) – like it or not, with MMS as ‘nominated’ PM yet again for another five years or till the ‘youthful’ no more @ 39 Crowned Prince decide to decide how to carry on the legacy of mis-governance inherited from ‘the great Nana dear of Daddy dear’ – in which ever case we are doomed/destined to be misgoverned by Sonia ‘Maino’ Gandhi and her son and then grand son/daughter…

History seldom provides another opportunity to any; but MMS has got another chance (thanks to Mata Ji). I being a democrat (howsoever flawed it may be, yet it is best option as I see it)  hope MMS won’t fail HIS Nation this time; at least for as long as he remains as Prime Minion Minister. He has served the ‘Dynasty’ for far too long and with distinction. Of course! I fervently hope that this time at least he would serve the nation too. Even if with half a commitment as he has for the ‘Family’, it would be good job done.

If Sonia ‘Maino’ Gandhi had always been ‘loyal’ to her ‘Countryman’ using/abusing YOU (MMS govt), what stops MMS to help OWN ‘really poor’ fellow Countrymen, Women and Children! Using this ‘mysterious win’ to his (in the interest of his own country) advantage he can do it- if he so wants. Time for MMS to prove he is ‘The Prime Minister’ of a billion strong Nation called ‘BHARAT’ not merely a ‘Prime Minion’ of one family @ 10 Janpath alone.

Dr. MMS wish you are listening. Are you? I wish you luck and hope you would prove to be more than just a ‘survivor’ and ‘pension seeker’ unlike any other good ‘Career Babu’.

As for BJP: This defeat presents an opportunity to introspect and do that sincerely. May be we are heading towards bipolarity of politics, though it still is premature to say so conclusively. It is high time to put act together and bounce back, Bharat would do well to have a strong ‘Right leaning’ counter force against the onslaught of ‘supposedly secular forces’.

Friends, whatever is happening in BJP is not necessarily bad (as made out and amplified by MSM) rather this ‘churning’ will help BJP and new leadership emerge and ‘strongly’ too. One way forward is to go back to basics and stop try to being secular.

What ever BJP may try; two things are certain…

  1. The ‘Most Secular’ 15% of Indian population would just not vote for you.
  2. The ‘Sec-Soc’ liberal and progressive media would only foul mouth any thing ‘Hindi, Hindu and Hindutava’.

MSM through this victory of ‘Dynasty’ has tasted the blood. The mighty omniscient, omni known and omnipresent ‘Sec- Soc Liberal and Progressive’ media might pose a serious challenge to the Bharat.

Prudent Indian.

Read Full Post »

(For some technical reason I am not getting the video on post, PLEASE SEE THE VIDEO HERE)

Chiddu can not evade some direct questions. This anger among Sikhs has been simmering since 1984 anti Sikh Pogrom Congress and it’s goon presided.

Giving ‘clean chit’ to Jagdish Tytler and Sajjan Kumar by CBI- Congress’s Bureau of Investigation burial - was last straw. This act of journalist is the manifestation of ‘anger and frustration’ shared by majority of Sikhs is:  what has been reflected.

I am neither condemning nor condoning this act of ‘Sikh Journalist’. Because, I can understand the frustration of Sikhs very well.

Before Chiddu, Arjun Singh – another Secular Jihadi – too had sought to malign all Sikhs for the assassination of Mrs. Indira Gandhi. Equally sad is the fact that Man Mohan Singh the Prime Minion of Sonia ‘Maino’ Gandhi does not remember ’1984 Anti Sikh Pogrom’ any more but sheds tears for Gujarat riots recalling those as  ‘Holocaust’!!!!

As aside: I wonder whether this journalist had ever practiced throwing in a cricket field! If this man just could not hit target from a distance of two meters…  he is not in my cricket team.

PI.



Read Full Post »

 

Slumdogs? Shame on us to say 'Jai Ho'!

Slumdogs? Shame on us to say 'Jai Ho'!

Millions of Congratulations to Sonia ‘Maino’ Gandhi’s closely held family Mafiso firm  called ‘Congress’ for keeping the Millions of Indians in perpetual poverty. The Election time is the right or most opportune time for them (Congress and it’s acolytes) to reap benefits for keeping the majority of Indians ‘perpetually poor’ though ‘ the ONE Mr. ‘Q’ – just an Italian country mate - was ‘legally’ made to fleece the Indians of their money and  get away with it. Thanks ‘Madame’s’ Prime Minions for small Mercies! Huh!

CongratulationsWhy? You ask !!! 

Why? Because…

Congress has misruled India for the major part since 1947 ensuring ‘ONLY’ the making of ‘Millions of Slumdogs’ and equally ensuring ‘Millions’ are made off them …for… ???? 

Agar Slums Na Hote Tou to ‘Slumdogs’ Na Hotey,

Slumdogs Na Hotey; To Oscars Na Hotey. 

Isiliye ‘Jai Ho’ Is Congress Ki ???? 

If guided ‘poverty tourism’ by the Clown Prince with a License to ruin rule’ was not an effective advertisement of their ‘callibre’ then approperating Slumdog Millionaire’s song celeberating their achievements leave us in no doubt. No doubt whatsoever – who gets maximum votes (for keeping Million ‘other’  Indians as Dogs in Slums) or Notes to stash in ‘gupt’ – not any more - Swiss Banks

SO JAI HO !!!!! Really ???? 

‘Another chance’ for this selected or any another PRIME MINION @ the mercy of ‘Her Majesty’ to produce ‘Million more SlumDogs’? 

BHAY HO!


Thanks Mallika for posting the above video.

PI.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,562 other followers